generate_uuid
FREE (no wallet needed): generate UUID v4 values, up to 100 at once.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | How many, 1-100 |
FREE (no wallet needed): generate UUID v4 values, up to 100 at once.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | How many, 1-100 |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations; description straightforwardly describes the action. Simple generation with no side effects, but could mention idempotency or safety.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise, front-loaded with key info, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with low complexity, description sufficient. Lacks return format but standard for UUID generation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage 100%, description repeats schema info ('up to 100'). No added meaning beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'generate', resource 'UUID v4 values', and constraint 'up to 100 at once'. Distinct from siblings like random_numbers.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly mentions 'FREE (no wallet needed)', setting context for usage. Does not contrast with siblings but provides clear condition.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.