Sunset Strip: GTA 6

Today's GTA 6 challenge

get_daily_challenge

Read-only

Today's GTA 6 clip challenge (the Daily Job) on Sunset Strip, with rules and what's coming up. Jobs start when GTA 6 unlocks on 19 Nov 2026.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_daily_challenge"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedOct 22, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, and the description adds genuinely useful behavioral context beyond them: the payload includes rules and upcoming info, and jobs only start when GTA 6 unlocks on 19 Nov 2026, warning the agent that content may be absent pre-launch. It stops short of saying what is returned before that date.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences, front-loaded with the resource and scope, followed by the availability caveat. Nothing is redundant and every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a no-param read tool with annotations covering safety and no output schema, describing the returned content (rules, what's coming up) plus the launch-date gating is nearly complete. The only gap is what the tool actually yields before 19 Nov 2026 — an empty result, an error, or a placeholder.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; no parameter semantics need explaining. The description correctly does not waste space on inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific resource ('Daily Job' / today's GTA 6 clip challenge on Sunset Strip) and its contents (rules, what's coming up), which clearly separates it from get_top_clips and the map/unlock-time siblings. The verb is only implied by 'get' in the name rather than stated outright, keeping it just short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the wording — an agent infers it should call this for the current daily challenge rather than clip rankings or launch facts. However, no explicit when-to-use, when-not, or named alternatives appear in the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Sunset Strip: GTA 6 tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?