Skip to main content
Glama

Publish post now

posts_publish
Idempotent

Publish now: a draft, a scheduled or missed post, or retry failures. A failed post only retries the destinations that failed; the ones that went out are not posted twice.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "posts_publish"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
orgNoOrg id (default: your first org)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true. The description adds valuable concrete retry semantics beyond annotations: only failed destinations are retried and successful destinations are not reposted. There is no contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and covered scenarios. The second sentence adds important retry nuance without filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation with annotations covering safety and idempotency, the description supplies scenario and retry behavior. However, it leaves the required 'id' unspecified and does not clarify the 'org' parameter, which is a material gap for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50%: 'org' is documented with a default, but the required 'id' parameter has no description. The tool description never mentions 'id' or 'org', so it does not compensate for the missing parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Publish now' a 'post') and enumerates eligible states: draft, scheduled, missed, or failed retry. This clearly distinguishes it from siblings such as posts_create and posts_edit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains exactly when to invoke the tool: to publish a draft, scheduled, or missed post, or to retry failures. It does not name explicit alternatives or exclusions, such as using posts_edit to modify before publishing, so it falls short of full routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources