List SignSimple's free, professionally drafted document templates (NDA, lease, contractor agreement, liability waiver, bill of sale, promissory note). Returns each template's info page and direct PDF URL — pass the PDF URL to send_for_signature as document_url to send one. No API key needed.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses return format ('info page and direct PDF URL'), content nature ('free, professionally drafted'), and authentication requirement ('No API key needed'). It does not mention side effects, but as a list operation, the behavior is clearly read-only and adequately transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every sentence provides essential information. It avoids redundancy and is highly efficient, making it an excellent example of concise yet complete tool documentation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (zero parameters, no output schema), the description is complete. It states what the tool does, what it returns, how to use the return value with send_for_signature, and the authentication context. No critical aspects are missing for an agent to invoke and utilize the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description appropriately focuses on what the list returns rather than parameter details, which is not needed. No parameter information is required, and the description adds meaningful context about how the output is used.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'SignSimple's free, professionally drafted document templates', with specific examples. It distinguishes from sibling tools by focusing on templates versus documents, and its mention of passing PDF URLs to send_for_signature reinforces its unique role.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context: this tool supplies templates that can be used with send_for_signature by passing the returned PDF URL. It also notes 'No API key needed', which is a usage condition. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or offer alternatives to other sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct action: listing documents, checking a single document's status, listing templates, and sending for signature. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_document_status, list_documents, list_templates, send_for_signature. The conventions are uniform.
Four tools is a well-scoped set for a focused e-signature service, covering the core workflow without unnecessary bulk. This fits the typical 3-15 tool range.
The surface covers the essential lifecycle: send, check status, list documents, and generate from templates. Minor gaps exist, such as no cancel/void or reminder actions, but they are not critical for the basic use case.