Skip to main content
Glama

Seasonal Reset

reset_season

Photograph the same property in another season: take the snow off the ground, the roof and the branches and put the garden in leaf, or move a summer shot to autumn or winter. The house, the driveway, the paths and the camera angle stay exactly as shot. Costs credits from the user's Pixly balance.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
r2PathNoStorage path of a photo already in the user's Pixly library (from list_library, or returned by an upload ticket) — the alternative to imageUrl.
seasonNoThe season to show the property in: 'spring', 'summer', 'autumn', 'winter', or 'auto' (the default — the tool shows the property at its best, which for a snowy or dormant photo means high summer). Only the planting, the ground cover and the daylight change; the house, the driveway, the paths and the framing stay exactly as shot.
imageUrlNoPublic https URL of the source photo, or a data: URI. Either imageUrl or r2Path is required.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
noteNo
typeNo
errorNo
jobIdYesPass to get_job to poll
statusYespending | processing | completed | failed — anything not completed/failed is still running
createdAtNo
resultUrlsNoPresent when completed; valid 7 days
completedAtNo
creditsChargedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / r2Path / description
      Previous value: -"R2 object path from an upload ticket (the create_upload_ticket tool, or POST /api/v1/uploads over REST) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."New value: +"Storage path of a photo already in the user's Pixly library (from list_library, or returned by an upload ticket) — the alternative to imageUrl."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "completedAt": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "createdAt": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "creditsCharged": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "number",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "jobId": {
      +      "description": "Pass to get_job to poll",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "resultUrls": {
      +      "description": "Present when completed; valid 7 days",
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "description": "pending | processing | completed | failed — anything not completed/failed is still running",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "jobId",
      +    "status"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / r2Path / description
      Previous value: -"R2 object path from an upload ticket (POST /api/v1/uploads) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."New value: +"R2 object path from an upload ticket (the create_upload_ticket tool, or POST /api/v1/uploads over REST) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."
  4. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnly=false and destructive=false; the description adds valuable context: 'Costs credits from the user's Pixly balance' and the invariance of geometry ('house, driveway, paths, camera angle stay exactly as shot'). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler, front-loaded with the core purpose and followed by concrete examples and a cost warning. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the schema covers all parameters, annotations cover safety profile, and the description adds credit cost and invariance constraints, the definition is complete for a mutation tool. An output schema exists, so return-format details are not required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are fully documented in the input schema. The description adds overall behavior but no additional per-parameter meaning beyond what the schema already states (e.g., season enum details). Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource: 'Photograph the same property in another season' with concrete transformations (snow off ground/roof/branches, garden in leaf, summer to autumn/winter). Clear purpose, but it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like replace_lawn or replace_sky, so it misses the top score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context for when to use: changing the season of a property photo, with examples. No explicit exclusions or named alternatives, but the intended use is evident from the description and season parameter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources