Skip to main content
Glama

Enhance

enhance_photo

Real estate photo editing in one step: turn an amateur listing photo into a finished, professional photo (exposure, color, clarity). Returns 3 variants to pick from. Costs credits from the user's Pixly balance.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
r2PathNoStorage path of a photo already in the user's Pixly library (from list_library, or returned by an upload ticket) — the alternative to imageUrl.
imageUrlNoPublic https URL of the source photo, or a data: URI. Either imageUrl or r2Path is required.
listingIdNoA property folder (from list_listings or create_listing) to put the result in. Results of a photo that is already in a folder go there by themselves.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
jobsNoSeveral jobs at once (get_job with jobIds, or a plan's steps): each one's jobId, status and results
noteNo
typeNo
errorNo
jobIdYesPass to get_job to poll
quoteNoPresent when status is "awaiting_confirmation": nothing ran and nothing was charged yet — the price and settings the user is asked to confirm
statusYespending | processing | completed | failed — anything not completed/failed is still running
createdAtNo
resultUrlsNoPresent when completed; valid 7 days
completedAtNo
resultPathsNoStorage path of each result — pass one as r2Path (or beforeR2Path, a photos[] item) to run another tool on this result
creditsChargedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / listingId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "A property folder (from list_listings or create_listing) to put the result in. Results of a photo that is already in a folder go there by themselves.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / jobs
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Several jobs at once (get_job with jobIds, or a plan's steps): each one's jobId, status and results",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / quote
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Present when status is \"awaiting_confirmation\": nothing ran and nothing was charged yet — the price and settings the user is asked to confirm",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / resultPaths
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Storage path of each result — pass one as r2Path (or beforeR2Path, a photos[] item) to run another tool on this result",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / r2Path / description
      Previous value: -"R2 object path from an upload ticket (the create_upload_ticket tool, or POST /api/v1/uploads over REST) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."New value: +"Storage path of a photo already in the user's Pixly library (from list_library, or returned by an upload ticket) — the alternative to imageUrl."
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "completedAt": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "createdAt": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "creditsCharged": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "number",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "jobId": {
      +      "description": "Pass to get_job to poll",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "resultUrls": {
      +      "description": "Present when completed; valid 7 days",
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "description": "pending | processing | completed | failed — anything not completed/failed is still running",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "jobId",
      +    "status"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / r2Path / description
      Previous value: -"R2 object path from an upload ticket (POST /api/v1/uploads) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."New value: +"R2 object path from an upload ticket (the create_upload_ticket tool, or POST /api/v1/uploads over REST) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."
  7. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (readOnly=false, destructive=false, idempotent=false, openWorld=true), the description discloses two genuinely useful traits: it returns 3 variants rather than one, and it consumes Pixly credits, which matters because idempotentHint=false means retries are billable. It stops short of saying how many credits or whether each variant is a separate charge.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, each load-bearing: purpose, output behavior, and cost. The primary action is front-loaded before the secondary facts.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so variant structure need not be spelled out, and annotations carry the safety profile. What the description supplies (variant count, credit cost) plus the schema's source-path guidance makes it adequate, though credit amount and output resolution remain unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so r2Path, imageUrl, and listingId are already fully documented in the schema, including the 'either/or' requirement for the image source. The description adds nothing about parameters, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('turn an amateur listing photo into a finished, professional photo') and names the edit dimensions it covers (exposure, color, clarity), which separates it from siblings such as restyle_room, declutter_photo, or touch_up_exterior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the framing ('in one step', cost in credits), but the description never states when to choose this over the many sibling photo editors, nor any when-not condition. An agent must infer the fit from surrounding tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources