Skip to main content
Glama

Declutter

declutter_photo

Remove clutter, mess, and personal items from a listing photo while keeping the room, furniture, and architecture intact. Costs credits from the user's Pixly balance.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
r2PathNoStorage path of a photo already in the user's Pixly library (from list_library, or returned by an upload ticket) — the alternative to imageUrl.
imageUrlNoPublic https URL of the source photo, or a data: URI. Either imageUrl or r2Path is required.
listingIdNoA property folder (from list_listings or create_listing) to put the result in. Results of a photo that is already in a folder go there by themselves.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
jobsNoSeveral jobs at once (get_job with jobIds, or a plan's steps): each one's jobId, status and results
noteNo
typeNo
errorNo
jobIdYesPass to get_job to poll
quoteNoPresent when status is "awaiting_confirmation": nothing ran and nothing was charged yet — the price and settings the user is asked to confirm
statusYespending | processing | completed | failed — anything not completed/failed is still running
createdAtNo
resultUrlsNoPresent when completed; valid 7 days
completedAtNo
resultPathsNoStorage path of each result — pass one as r2Path (or beforeR2Path, a photos[] item) to run another tool on this result
creditsChargedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / listingId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "A property folder (from list_listings or create_listing) to put the result in. Results of a photo that is already in a folder go there by themselves.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / jobs
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Several jobs at once (get_job with jobIds, or a plan's steps): each one's jobId, status and results",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / quote
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Present when status is \"awaiting_confirmation\": nothing ran and nothing was charged yet — the price and settings the user is asked to confirm",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / resultPaths
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Storage path of each result — pass one as r2Path (or beforeR2Path, a photos[] item) to run another tool on this result",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / r2Path / description
      Previous value: -"R2 object path from an upload ticket (the create_upload_ticket tool, or POST /api/v1/uploads over REST) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."New value: +"Storage path of a photo already in the user's Pixly library (from list_library, or returned by an upload ticket) — the alternative to imageUrl."
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "completedAt": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "createdAt": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "creditsCharged": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "number",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "jobId": {
      +      "description": "Pass to get_job to poll",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "resultUrls": {
      +      "description": "Present when completed; valid 7 days",
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "description": "pending | processing | completed | failed — anything not completed/failed is still running",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "jobId",
      +    "status"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / r2Path / description
      Previous value: -"R2 object path from an upload ticket (POST /api/v1/uploads) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."New value: +"R2 object path from an upload ticket (the create_upload_ticket tool, or POST /api/v1/uploads over REST) — the alternative to imageUrl when the photo is a local file."
  7. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already disclose that this mutates state, is not idempotent, and is non-destructive; the description adds the material detail that it consumes credits from the user's Pixly balance, which annotations cannot express. It does not say whether repeated calls re-charge credits or what happens to untouched regions, so it stops short of 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste: function and scope first, then the cost consequence. Nothing padded or repeated from structured fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need no explanation, and the credit-cost caveat covers the main behavioral risk. A gentle note on credit exhaustion failure behavior is the only real gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and all three parameters are documented there, including the r2Path/imageUrl alternative. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb ('remove clutter, mess, and personal items') plus resource (a listing photo) with a stated scope constraint: keep room, furniture, and architecture intact. That constraint helps separate it from siblings like remove_furniture or restyle_room, though those tools are never named.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage is clear from 'listing photo', but there is no explicit when-to-use or when-not guidance and no mention of the obvious alternatives (remove_furniture, edit_staged_photo, restyle_room) that an agent must choose between.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources