Skip to main content
Glama

update_vehicle

Partially update an existing vehicle's details; only the fields provided are changed, everything else is left as-is. For string and due-date fields, omitting the field leaves the stored value unchanged, while sending an empty string clears it.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID of the vehicle to update.
vinNoVehicle Identification Number: a 17-character alphanumeric code unique to the vehicle. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
makeNoManufacturer of the vehicle, e.g. 'Toyota'. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
yearNoModel year of the vehicle. Must be between 1900 and 2100. Omit to leave unchanged.
modelNoModel name of the vehicle, e.g. 'Corolla'. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
notesNoFree-text notes about the vehicle. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
colourNoColour of the vehicle. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
motDueDateNoDate the next MOT (roadworthiness test) is due, in YYYY-MM-DD format. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
taxDueDateNoDate the vehicle's road tax is next due, in YYYY-MM-DD format. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
registrationNoThe vehicle's registration/licence plate as shown on the plate. Free-text; format varies by country. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
serviceDueDateNoDate the vehicle's next scheduled service is due, in YYYY-MM-DD format. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.
insuranceDocumentIdNoDocument ID of the associated insurance policy document. Omit to leave unchanged, or send an empty string to clear it.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes
titleNo
messageNo
variantNo

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only indicate non-read-only and non-destructive. The description adds important behavioral nuance: only provided fields are changed, and sending an empty string clears string/due-date fields. This goes beyond the default update intent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the purpose, then the key behavior. No filler or redundant repetition of schema content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 12 parameters and the presence of an output schema, the description adequately covers the core update semantics and clearing behavior. Field-specific details are appropriately delegated to the schema, and no major context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all 12 parameters with per-field omit/clear guidance (100% coverage). The description adds value by generalizing the pattern and distinguishing string/due-date fields from the integer year, which does not accept empty-string clearing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Partially update' with 'an existing vehicle's details', clearly distinguishing from create_vehicle and delete_vehicle sibling tools. This is a specific verb+resource+scope formulation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clarifies when to use the tool by explaining partial-update semantics and the omit-vs-empty-string behavior. It provides clear context but does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusion conditions; however, sibling tool names make these obvious.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear descriptions separating similar-sounding tools like create_calendar_event vs create_recurring_calendar_event. Shopping list operations (add, buy, remove, update) are clearly delineated.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern: create_*, list_*, update_*, delete_*, get_*, etc. Even special operations like store_memory, recall_memory, and skip_recommendation fit the pattern.

Tool Count1/5

With 68 tools, this server vastly exceeds a reasonable scope; the instruction manual indicates 50+ tools is an extreme mismatch. The breadth suggests the server should be split into focused sub-servers (tasks, shopping, calendar, etc.) rather than a single monolithic interface.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers full CRUD/lifecycle for all major resources: tasks, shopping, calendar, contacts, documents, appliances, vehicles, pets, recipes, meal plans, subscriptions, and memories. Additional features like house review, weather, and profile round out the household management domain.

Resources