Skip to main content
Glama

MoveMate: Gym Workout Tracker

Show getting started

show_getting_started
Read-onlyIdempotent

Shows a MoveMate quick-start card with first steps the user can tap: plan this week, a workout for today, or bring over past workouts. Tapping one sends it as the user's next message. Use it once when get_profile reports a new account and the user has no specific request yet, or when the user asks what they can do with MoveMate here. It changes nothing in the account.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "show_getting_started"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
localeYes
actionsYes
new_accountYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover safety (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), but the description adds the non-obvious interaction contract: tapping a card sends it as the user's next message, so the agent must not treat the call as a no-op. It also explicitly confirms no account state changes, reinforcing rather than contradicting the hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with what the tool does, then when to use it, then a safety reassurance. Every sentence carries distinct information with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return-shape explanation is unnecessary, and the description instead covers the things schema cannot: the UI behavior, the downstream effect of a tap, and the invocation trigger. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is nothing parameter-level the description could usefully add. The description correctly spends no words on inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Shows a MoveMate quick-start card') and enumerates the concrete actions the card offers (plan this week, workout for today, import past workouts). This is unmistakably distinct from the CRUD/query siblings listed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit trigger conditions: once, when get_profile reports a new account with no specific request, or when the user asks what they can do here. It even names the gating sibling tool (get_profile) and the cardinality constraint ('use it once').

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources