Skip to main content
Glama

LiquidVision — Crypto Derivatives Data

get_top_traders

Read-onlyIdempotent

Top lead traders (OKX copy trading, public data): total PnL, win rate, AUM, copiers, live open positions (pair, side, leverage, entry, uPnL) and recently closed trades with realized PnL.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_top_traders"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, openWorld and non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful context beyond that: the source is public OKX copy-trading data and the result includes both live positions and recently closed trades. It does not say how many traders are returned, how 'recent' is bounded, or anything about freshness/caching, so it is additive but incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence that names the resource first and then lists returned fields in a parenthetical. Dense but every clause carries information; only minor tightening is possible.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters and no output schema, the description must carry the return shape, and it does list the field groups. However, it omits the number of traders returned, the ranking criterion for 'top', and the time window for closed trades — details an agent would need to interpret results correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, which is the baseline-4 case; there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. The description correctly implies a fixed, no-argument call.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb+resource: retrieving top lead traders from OKX copy trading, and enumerates the payload (PnL, win rate, AUM, copiers, live positions, closed trades). It is clearly distinguishable from siblings like get_hl_whales or get_long_short_ratio. It stops short of 5 because 'top' is never defined — no ranking metric or count is stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use statement and no named alternative. The parenthetical 'OKX copy trading, public data' hints at the domain and that no credentials are needed, but an agent gets no guidance on choosing this over other trader/whale-oriented siblings such as get_hl_whales.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources