Skip to main content
Glama

Create a render upload

create_render_upload
Destructive

Create a one-use account-private upload for a video you are authorized to analyse. Stream raw MP4/WebM bytes to the returned authenticated PUT endpoint; 100 MiB and 180 seconds maximum. This reserves temporary private storage and never publishes to the catalogue.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "create_render_upload"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
schema_versionYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description discloses important behavior: the upload is one-use and account-private, uses an authenticated PUT endpoint, has 100 MiB and 180 second limits, reserves temporary private storage, and never publishes to the catalogue. These details materially help an agent understand operational constraints and privacy behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two tight sentences with no wasted wording. It front-loads the primary purpose, then immediately adds the upload mechanics and storage constraints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool with an output schema, the description is complete: it explains what is created, how bytes should be sent, the limits, and the privacy scope. Return-value details are appropriately left to the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description still adds useful upload semantics, including the expected media types, destination endpoint, size limit, and time limit, even though there are no parameters to document.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: creating a one-use, account-private upload for a video authorized for analysis. It also clarifies scope by saying the storage is temporary and private, which distinguishes it from render-result and catalogue-related siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear usage condition: the video must be one the caller is authorized to analyse, and raw MP4/WebM bytes are streamed to the returned authenticated PUT endpoint. It does not explicitly name alternatives or when not to use this tool, so it falls short of full when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources