Skip to main content
Glama

Get the authenticated agent wallet’s shared participation-release state

kellian_get_participation_release
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return the authenticated agent wallet’s redacted, one-human participation-release state.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "kellian_get_participation_release"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, open-world operation. The description adds useful behavioral context by scoping the result to the authenticated agent wallet and calling it 'redacted,' but it does not explain authentication requirements, error behavior, or what 'one-human' means.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler. It identifies the return subject immediately, though the domain term 'participation-release' remains unexplained.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple, the output schema is present, and annotations are rich, so much of the burden is already covered. However, the central concept ('participation-release state') and the distinction from related release/participation tools are left undefined, which leaves a meaningful selection gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters, so there are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify. Baseline 4 is appropriate for a zero-parameter getter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: return the authenticated agent wallet’s participation-release state. It also adds scope qualifiers ('redacted, one-human'), but it does not distinguish this from siblings such as kellian_get_participation_distribution or kellian_get_token_release.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no exclusions, and no named alternative. The read-only nature is implied, but an agent must infer when this state is relevant versus related release or participation tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources