Skip to main content
Glama

Get a redacted participation distribution status for the authenticated agent

kellian_get_participation_distribution
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return redacted finality and delivery state for an identity-owned participation intent.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "intentId": "<intentId>"
    },
    "name": "kellian_get_participation_distribution"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
intentIdYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

B3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, open-world, non-destructive behavior. The description adds that the result is redacted and reports finality/delivery state, but does not explain redaction, auth constraints, or what states mean.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single focused sentence with no repetition or filler. It is front-loaded and easy to scan, though the jargon 'finality' is unexplained.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is low-complexity and has an output schema plus meaningful annotations, so the description need not explain return values. However, it omits parameter mapping and sibling disambiguation, leaving gaps for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one required intentId with 0% description coverage, and the description never mentions the parameter or its expected value. It implies an intent but does not compensate for the missing schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb ('Return') and resource ('redacted finality and delivery state') for an 'identity-owned participation intent,' making the operation recognizable. It does not distinguish this from nearby siblings such as kellian_get_participation_release or kellian_get_trade_intent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to call this instead of get_participation_release or other status getters. The phrase 'identity-owned participation intent' supplies context but not selection criteria or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources