kanbai_get_sop
Get one public SOP by numeric id, including its full content.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | SOP id. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sop | Yes |
Get one public SOP by numeric id, including its full content.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | SOP id. |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sop | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+ "additionalProperties": false,
+ "properties": {
+ "sop": {
+ "additionalProperties": false,
+ "properties": {
+ "category": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "content": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "id": {
+ "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
+ "maximum": 9007199254740991,
+ "type": "integer"
+ },
+ "title": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "url": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "video_url": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ "required": [
+ "id",
+ "title",
+ "category",
+ "url",
+ "content",
+ "video_url"
+ ],
+ "type": "object"
+ }
+ },
+ "required": [
+ "sop"
+ ],
+ "type": "object"
+}Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds useful context beyond annotations by specifying that only public SOPs are accessible and that the full content is returned, which informs the agent about scope and response expectations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the resource, the scope ('public'), the lookup method ('numeric id'), and the response behavior ('full content') with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter, read-only getter with a full output schema and strong annotations, the description is complete. It tells the agent exactly what will be fetched and under what scope, and the output schema covers return-value details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with the id parameter already described as 'SOP id' and constrained to positive integers. The description's 'numeric id' mildly reinforces this but does not add substantial new meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a specific verb and resource: 'Get one public SOP by numeric id'. It also differentiates from sibling tools by specifying 'one' SOP rather than a list, and by naming SOP rather than template, so an agent can distinguish it from list_sops and get_template.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives clear context: use this tool when fetching a single public SOP by its numeric id, including full content. It does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it, but the singular 'one' versus the sibling list tools provides enough implicit guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.