Skip to main content
Glama

Inkfree MCP templates list

mcp_inkfree_templates_list
Read-only

List the caller's Inkfree templates and folders. Omit parentId (or pass 0) to browse the root/home folder; pass a folder's id as parentId to browse into it. Pass search for a flat full-text search across ALL folders instead (parentId is ignored when search is set). Each row's type is either 'folder' or 'template'. Use a template's id with mcp_inkfree_sign_request_send_from_template to send an envelope from it.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "mcp_inkfree_templates_list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number. Default 1.
limitNoMax rows per page (server-clamped). Default 25.
searchNoFree-text search over template/folder name, email subject, and signer name/email, across all folders.
parentIdNoFolder id to browse into. Omit or 0 for the root/home folder. Ignored when search is set.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered. The description usefully adds behavior beyond that: the parentId-vs-search interaction, search scope across ALL folders, and the fact that each row carries a 'type' of 'folder' or 'template'. It does not mention pagination limits/total counts, but that is largely covered by the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four tight sentences, front-loaded with the core action, then the parentId/search behavior, then the row shape, then the cross-reference. No filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-required-parameter list tool with no output schema, the description covers mode selection, filtering semantics, and the meaning of the returned row type — everything an agent needs to call and interpret it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter descriptions already state the 0/omit root convention, the ignore-when-search-set rule, and the search field scope. The description restates these rather than adding new meaning, so it sits at the baseline 3 despite the extra clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with a specific verb + resource + scope: 'List the caller's Inkfree templates and folders.' This clearly separates it from siblings like templates_folders_tree (hierarchy view) or report_templates (reporting) without needing to open any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit conditional routing: omit parentId/0 for root browse, pass a folder id to drill in, use search for flat full-text across all folders (with the note that parentId is ignored). It also names the downstream tool, mcp_inkfree_sign_request_send_from_template, and tells the agent when to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.