Skip to main content
Glama

The user's websites, plan and limits

list_sites
Read-onlyIdempotent

Use when you need a site_id, or the user asks about their websites, plan, limits, credits or page views. Lists every site with its URL and form message count, plus what the plan allows.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYesThe answer in words, the same as the text content: read it (for get_guide the whole guide, for get_site the files' contents).
sitesYesEvery website of the account.
accountYesPlan, limits and usage of the signed-in account.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / text
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The answer in words, the same as the text content: read it (for get_guide the whole guide, for get_site the files' contents).",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "account",
      -  "sites"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "account",
      +  "sites",
      +  "text"
      +]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / account / properties / email
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "The signed-in account's email.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / account / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "email",
      -  "plan",
      -  "websites",
      -  "custom_domains",
      -  "files_per_website",
      -  "photos",
      -  "credits",
      -  "page_views_this_month",
      -  "assistant_limits",
      -  "upgrade_url",
      -  "admin_users_per_website",
      -  "part_limits_per_website"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "plan",
      +  "websites",
      +  "custom_domains",
      +  "files_per_website",
      +  "photos",
      +  "credits",
      +  "page_views_this_month",
      +  "assistant_limits",
      +  "upgrade_url",
      +  "admin_users_per_website",
      +  "part_limits_per_website"
      +]
  3. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / account / properties / credits / description
      Previous value: -"Credits for Ginta's own in-app AI."New value: +"Credits for Ginta's own in-app AI: balance without today's daily credits, and the daily credits left (used first)."
    • addedOutput schema / properties / account / properties / credits / properties / daily
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / account / properties / credits / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "balance",
      -  "note"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "balance",
      +  "daily",
      +  "note"
      +]
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / account / properties / part_limits_per_website
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "Caps of the shop, bookings and events per website (null = no limit).",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "bookings_per_month": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "number",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "shop_products": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "number",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "upcoming_events": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "number",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "shop_products",
      +    "bookings_per_month",
      +    "upcoming_events"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / account / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "email",
      -  "plan",
      -  "websites",
      -  "custom_domains",
      -  "files_per_website",
      -  "photos",
      -  "credits",
      -  "page_views_this_month",
      -  "assistant_limits",
      -  "upgrade_url",
      -  "admin_users_per_website"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "email",
      +  "plan",
      +  "websites",
      +  "custom_domains",
      +  "files_per_website",
      +  "photos",
      +  "credits",
      +  "page_views_this_month",
      +  "assistant_limits",
      +  "upgrade_url",
      +  "admin_users_per_website",
      +  "part_limits_per_website"
      +]
  5. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / account / properties / photos
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "The owner's photos (attach_image) in use on all websites, and the plan's limit.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "limit": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "used": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "used",
      +    "limit"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / account / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "email",
      -  "plan",
      -  "websites",
      -  "custom_domains",
      -  "files_per_website",
      -  "credits",
      -  "page_views_this_month",
      -  "assistant_limits",
      -  "upgrade_url",
      -  "admin_users_per_website"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "email",
      +  "plan",
      +  "websites",
      +  "custom_domains",
      +  "files_per_website",
      +  "photos",
      +  "credits",
      +  "page_views_this_month",
      +  "assistant_limits",
      +  "upgrade_url",
      +  "admin_users_per_website"
      +]
  6. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is fully covered elsewhere. The description's extra content is a summary of returned data, which the output schema also covers, so it adds only marginal behavioral context such as the completeness guarantee that all sites are returned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, with the usage trigger front-loaded before the payload description. There is no filler, no restatement of the title, and every clause carries information an agent can act on.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A zero-parameter, read-only listing tool with full annotation coverage and an output schema needs only a clear when-to-use and a note on contents. Both are present, so nothing required for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate and the baseline is 4. The mention that it is used when a site_id is needed hints at how the result feeds other tools, which is a small useful addition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Lists every site') and enumerates the payload ('URL and form message count, plus what the plan allows'). The 'every site' scope implicitly but clearly distinguishes it from the single-site sibling get_site.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit trigger ('Use when you need a site_id, or the user asks about their websites, plan, limits, credits or page views'), which is strong and covers the main call sites. It stops short of naming a when-not condition or pointing to alternatives such as get_site when only one site's detail is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources