Skip to main content
Glama

Vorlagen auflisten

template_list
Read-only

Vorlagen auflisten, Template-Liste, template list: Listet die verfügbaren Brief-Vorlagen für Anlässe wie Kündigung, Rechnung, Mahnung, Angebot, Vertrag und Behördenpost, mit Kategorie, Version und ihren Platzhaltern (Merge-Feldern). Der exakte technische Tool-Name ist template_list; falls dein Client Tools verzögert lädt, suche nach template_list. Standardmäßig nur freigegebene Vorlagen; mit statusFilter und dem Scope template:write auch offene Entwürfe. Jeder Eintrag sagt mit curated: true, ob es eine kuratierte FrankKi-Standardvorlage ist (die Bibliothek zum Kopieren), und mit hasBlocks: true, ob sie ein strukturiertes Layout mit Tabellen und Summen traegt statt Fliesstext. Naechster Schritt: template_get liefert eine Vorlage vollstaendig (bei einer Blockvorlage inklusive blocksTemplate und styleDefs zum Kopieren und Anpassen), template_apply_with_merge_fields fuellt sie mit deinen Werten. EN: List templates, template list: lists the available letter templates for occasions such as cancellation, invoice, payment reminder, quote, contract and letters to public authorities, with category, version and their placeholders (merge fields). The exact technical tool name is template_list; if your client defers tools, search for template_list. By default it returns released templates; with statusFilter and the template:write scope also open drafts. Every entry says with curated: true whether it is a curated FrankKi standard template (the library to copy from), and with hasBlocks: true whether it carries a structured layout with tables and totals instead of plain text. Next step: template_get returns one template in full (for a block template including blocksTemplate and styleDefs to copy and modify), template_apply_with_merge_fields fills it with your values.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoStandard 20, maximal 100. EN: Default 20, maximum 100.
offsetNoVersatz für die Seitennavigation. Standard 0. EN: Offset for pagination. Default 0.
reasoningNo
statusFilterNoreleased (Standard) zeigt alle freigegebenen Vorlagen. Eigenständige Formularvorlagen tragen sendable:false und brauchen beim Anwenden ein Anschreiben. draft zeigt nur offene Entwürfe, all beide. draft und all brauchen zusätzlich den Scope template:write. EN: released (default) shows every released template. Standalone form templates carry sendable:false and require a cover letter when applied. draft shows only open drafts, all shows both. draft and all additionally require the template:write scope.released
kategorieFilterNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the call as read-only and non-destructive; the description adds the default released-only behavior, the scope requirement for drafts, and the curated/hasBlocks flags on entries. This goes beyond the annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The core purpose is front-loaded, but the text is bloated by full bilingual repetition and an unnecessary reminder that the tool name is template_list. It remains readable but not every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by naming the fields returned per entry (category, version, placeholders, curated, hasBlocks) and by pointing to follow-up tools. It does not describe ordering or kategorieFilter usage, but the schema covers pagination parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description expands statusFilter meaningfully by linking it to the template:write scope and released/draft/all modes. With 60% schema coverage, kategorieFilter and reasoning still lack explanation, though limit and offset are already documented in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: listing the available letter templates for defined occasions, with category, version, and placeholders. It also clearly distinguishes itself from template_get, which returns a single template in full, so an agent can tell them apart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear context: default returns only released templates, drafts require statusFilter plus the template:write scope, and the next-step note routes to template_get for full content and template_apply_with_merge_fields for filling. It does not spell out explicit when-not-to-use conditions, but the workflow guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.