Skip to main content
Glama

Everloot: WoW Forever data

Everloot implementation tracker

everloot_plan
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns the Everloot feature catalogue: what is live, what is next, what is waiting, and which reference sites are page shapes only, as the tracker that ships with the site holds it. Use it only for questions about Everloot itself, such as whether a feature exists; it holds no game data. For game facts use search_knowledge or answer_sources; for community addons use ecosystem_projects. Takes no arguments and needs no account.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "everloot_plan"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rowsYesEvery row, in the tracker's order.
countsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, closed-world, non-destructive behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new context: it is the authoritative tracker that ships with the site, holds no game data, and requires no account. It does not describe result shape, but an output schema exists to carry that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads what the tool returns, then scope, then alternatives, then invocation constraints — a logical order with no filler. The clause "as the tracker that ships with the site holds it" is slightly awkward phrasing, a minor deduction.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a no-argument, read-only lookup with an output schema, the definition covers purpose, content categories, scope exclusions, sibling routing, and invocation requirements. Nothing an agent needs in order to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description's "Takes no arguments and needs no account" merely restates the empty schema but usefully assures the agent that no auth or input assembly is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("Returns the Everloot feature catalogue") and enumerates the categories returned: live, next, waiting, and page-shape-only reference sites. It is immediately distinguishable from siblings like search_knowledge and ecosystem_projects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly bounds scope ("Use it only for questions about Everloot itself, such as whether a feature exists") and names the correct alternatives for out-of-scope questions: search_knowledge or answer_sources for game facts, ecosystem_projects for community addons. Both when-to-use and when-not-to-use are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.