getMyPetsDevuelve las mascotas que el usuario autenticado tiene registradas en su perfil, incluyendo identificador, nombre, raza, edad y tamaño. Útil para asistir al usuario en la creación de una orden cuando es necesario seleccionar una mascota.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool returns the user's registered pets with specified fields, but it does not mention response format, potential errors, or edge cases like an empty list. It is minimally informative but not misleading.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core functionality and immediately followed by a practical use case. There is no redundant information, and every sentence adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple (zero parameters, no output schema), and the description covers what it returns and when to use it. It is complete for most practical purposes, though it could benefit from mentioning whether the list is ordered or filtered, but that is not essential for an agent to invoke it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, and the schema confirms an empty object. Per the rubric, a baseline of 4 is appropriate when no parameters exist, as the description does not need to explain parameter semantics.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Devuelve' meaning 'returns') and clearly identifies the resource: the authenticated user's registered pets. It also lists the included fields (identificador, nombre, raza, edad, tamaño), making it easy to distinguish from sibling tools like getMyOrders or getBreeds.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear usage context: 'Útil para asistir al usuario en la creación de una orden cuando es necesario seleccionar una mascota.' This indicates when to use it without explicitly naming alternatives, but it's clear enough for an agent to understand its role in the order creation flow.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: coverage checks, lead capture, order creation, breed catalog, chats, orders, pets, service catalog, shifts, and messaging. No two tools could be confused for the same purpose.
All tool names follow a consistent camelCase verb_noun pattern (checkCoverage, createLead, createOrder, getBreeds, getChatMessages, etc.). The pattern is predictable and uniform across the entire set.
12 tools is well-scoped for a pet service booking assistant. Each tool covers a clear need without being excessive or sparse.
Core workflows are covered: coverage, ordering, pets, chat, and service catalog. Minor gaps exist like no update/cancel order or add/edit pet, but agents can work around these as the primary booking flow is complete.