getBreedsDevuelve el catálogo completo de razas de perros reconocidas por Cooper. Útil para confirmar que una raza mencionada por el usuario está en el catálogo o para obtener el identificador requerido al crear una orden.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It plainly states this is a read operation returning a complete catalog, which implies no side effects, but it does not explicitly mention auth requirements, rate limits, or any edge cases. For a simple getter, this is adequate but not richly transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary purpose, followed by practical use cases. Every word earns its place, with no unnecessary detail or repetition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description provides sufficient context: what it returns, that it's a complete catalog, and how the output is used (to get an ID for order creation). It does not detail the return structure, but for a simple list of breeds with IDs, this is adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the schema provides no information to enhance. The description appropriately references the key use of the returned identifier for order creation, which adds context beyond the empty parameter list. Baseline for 0 params is 4, and the description does not need to explain parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns the complete catalog of dog breeds recognized by Cooper, using a specific verb ('Devuelve') and resource ('catálogo completo de razas'). It also distinguishes this from sibling tools like getServiceCatalog by focusing specifically on breeds and their role in order creation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives clear use cases: confirming a breed mentioned by the user or obtaining the breed ID needed to create an order. While it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or name alternative tools, the context is sufficient for an agent to decide when this tool is relevant.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: coverage checks, lead capture, order creation, breed catalog, chats, orders, pets, service catalog, shifts, and messaging. No two tools could be confused for the same purpose.
All tool names follow a consistent camelCase verb_noun pattern (checkCoverage, createLead, createOrder, getBreeds, getChatMessages, etc.). The pattern is predictable and uniform across the entire set.
12 tools is well-scoped for a pet service booking assistant. Each tool covers a clear need without being excessive or sparse.
Core workflows are covered: coverage, ordering, pets, chat, and service catalog. Minor gaps exist like no update/cancel order or add/edit pet, but agents can work around these as the primary booking flow is complete.