Skip to main content
Glama

Cellarion Wine Registry

by app.cellarion

Search the shared wine registry

search_registry
Read-only

Searches Cellarion's shared wine database (vintage-neutral wines, community data) by name, producer, region or grape. Returns up to 10 matches. Call to identify a wine the user mentions, before recommending, or to check whether a wine exists in the registry. This searches ALL known wines — use search_bottles for what the user owns.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesWine name, producer, appellation or grape

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true. The description adds that it returns up to 10 matches and searches by specified fields. No contradictions, but some behavioral details like pagination or ordering are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is four sentences, front-loading the main purpose and then adding usage context. It is relatively concise but could be tightened by merging sentences without losing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter search tool with no output schema, the description covers purpose, input semantics, result limit, usage scenarios, and an alternative tool, making it fully informative.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with a clear parameter name 'query' and description. The tool description restates valid search fields but does not add new semantics beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches the shared wine registry by name, producer, region, or grape, and distinguishes from the sibling tool 'search_bottles' by noting this searches all wines versus user-owned bottles.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use: to identify a wine mentioned, before recommending, or to check existence. It also advises when not to use it (use search_bottles for user-owned wines), providing clear context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Cellarion Wine Registry toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool addresses a distinct concern: registry search, wine detail, vintage-specific drink windows, similarity recommendations, guide listing, guide reading, and server metadata. No two tools serve the same purpose, and the descriptions clearly indicate when to use each.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_guides, read_guide, search_registry, get_wine, get_source_info, find_similar_wines). 'drink_window_for' is an outlier, using a noun phrase instead of an imperative verb, which introduces a minor inconsistency.

Tool Count5/5

With seven tools, the server is well-scoped and avoids bloat. Each tool provides a distinct capability, and the count is appropriate for a wine registry server covering search, details, drink windows, similar wines, guides, and metadata.

Completeness4/5

The core registry workflow is well covered: search_registry for identification, get_wine for details, drink_window_for for aging advice, and find_similar_wines for recommendations. However, multiple descriptions reference search_bottles for user-owned bottles, yet that tool is not provided, leaving a notable gap for user-specific queries.

Resources