Cabgo Builder

cabgo_pricing

Read-only

Public (no auth): informational pricing reference. Returns monthly SaaS subscriptions (Basic / Professional / Enterprise — $15/$30/$70 per month) and one-time app-build packages (Starter $399 Android-only, Pro $699 Android+iOS, Full $999 Android+iOS+source code). All plans include unlimited drivers / users / admins; Cabgo never charges commission per trip. Informational only. Do not generate or return a payment URL from this tool. When the operator wants to purchase, direct them to visit https://www.cabgo.app/empezar in their browser — all checkout happens on cabgo.app externally via Stripe, not inside this conversation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes

TDQS

A4.9/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that no auth is required, lists pricing details, notes that all plans include unlimited drivers/users/admins, states Cabgo never charges per trip, and warns against creating payment URLs. This adds context beyond the readOnlyHint annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured, starting with the core purpose, then listing details, and ending with clear usage instructions. Every sentence is meaningful and contributes to understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and the presence of an output schema, the description fully explains what the tool returns and how to use it. It covers all necessary context for an agent to correctly invoke and interpret the output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, so the input schema is empty. The description does not need to explain parameters, and the baseline score for 0 parameters is 4. The description adds no parameter information, but it is not required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is an informational pricing reference tool that returns specific SaaS subscription and app-build package details. It differentiates from sibling tools by being read-only and not involving purchase flows.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent when to use this tool (for pricing info) and when not to (do not generate payment URLs). Provides a clear alternative action: direct user to the external URL for purchase.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Cabgo Builder tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose: about, create app, create trial, publish requirements, install instructions, pricing, and signup. Even though cabgo_create_my_app and cabgo_create_trial both create tenants, their descriptions clearly differentiate them by context (free workspace vs trial) and intended use (immediate app creation vs trial configuration).

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools use the 'cabgo_' prefix consistently and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_my_app, create_trial, get_publish_requirements). Two tools (cabgo_about, cabgo_pricing) are nouns rather than verbs, but this is a minor deviation that does not hinder comprehension.

Tool Count5/5

With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped. The count is sufficient to cover the core onboarding workflow without being overwhelming or insufficient for the stated purpose of helping users launch and publish their app.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers the initial lifecycle (info, creation in two modes, publishing requirements, installation, pricing, and legacy signup). However, there are no tools for post-creation management (e.g., updating app settings, managing drivers, viewing analytics), which leaves notable gaps for ongoing operations.

Resources

Need Help?