Skip to main content
Glama

Read Arroway

arroway_read
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read Arroway for a project BEFORE acting on any task related to it. It serves the authored essence of memories, dated-log entries and handoffs by default; name a #handle in include to recover that object's full body.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sinceNoOptional: checkpoint from a previous read of THIS project, so standing rules are not reprinted. Omit after compaction or in a new conversation.
handoffNoOptional: #handle of an OPEN handoff you are continuing; the read is built from its reading list (none: falls back to the normal read). Cannot be combined with include.
includeNo#handles whose full body you need; they come first, so others fall out — it chooses, it does not add.
projectYesProject slug, e.g. 'seven50'
task_contextNoOptional: what you are about to do; it ranks results. The declaration alone is NOT evidence of use: a matching completion residue from the same session must corroborate it.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed14 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / handoff / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: the #handle of an OPEN handoff you are continuing. The read is then built from that handoff's reading list (the read_handles its author named): the standing rules in full, the handoff and every reference it names in full, and nothing ranked — much smaller than a normal read, and it counts as a delivered read. A handoff with no reading list falls back to the normal read, and says so. Cannot be combined with include; `since` is ignored. If a reference on the list is no longer available, the read is refused rather than served incomplete — read normally instead."New value: +"Optional: #handle of an OPEN handoff you are continuing; the read is built from its reading list (none: falls back to the normal read). Cannot be combined with include."
    • removedInput schema / properties / handoff / maxLength
      Removed value: -4096
    • removedInput schema / properties / handoff / minLength
      Removed value: -1
    • removedInput schema / properties / handoff / pattern
      Removed value: -"^#?(?:[0-9a-fA-F]{8,32}|[0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F-]{27})$"
    • changedInput schema / properties / include / description
      Previous value: -"#handles of memories, dated-log entries or handoffs whose full body you need. They are placed first and cannot be dropped by the budget — so other memories fall out instead: this chooses what you get, it does not get you more."New value: +"#handles whose full body you need; they come first, so others fall out — it chooses, it does not add."
    • removedInput schema / properties / include / items / pattern
      Removed value: -"^#?(?:[0-9a-fA-F]{8,32}|[0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F-]{27})$"
    • removedInput schema / properties / project / minLength
      Removed value: -1
    • removedInput schema / properties / project / pattern
      Removed value: -"^[a-z0-9]+(?:-[a-z0-9]+)*$"
    • changedInput schema / properties / since / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: the session checkpoint printed at the end of a previous read of THIS project. Presenting it lets the standing rules be referenced instead of reprinted, freeing that space for the task. Omit it — or present one this connection does not hold — and they are written out in full; the server decides, never your local state. If your context was compacted or this is a new conversation, omit it."New value: +"Optional: checkpoint from a previous read of THIS project, so standing rules are not reprinted. Omit after compaction or in a new conversation."
    • removedInput schema / properties / since / maxLength
      Removed value: -4096
    • removedInput schema / properties / since / minLength
      Removed value: -1
    • changedInput schema / properties / task_context / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: what you are about to do. It ranks what comes back, but the declaration alone is NOT evidence that a memory was used. A matching completion residue from the same session must corroborate it before Arroway updates the memory's observed-use signal."New value: +"Optional: what you are about to do; it ranks results. The declaration alone is NOT evidence of use: a matching completion residue from the same session must corroborate it."
    • removedInput schema / properties / task_context / minLength
      Removed value: -1
    • removedInput schema / x-maxSerializedLength
      Removed value: -131072
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds useful behavioral context about the default serving mode (essence vs. full body via include), but says nothing about result volume, truncation, or pagination behavior for a read that can return many objects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the imperative and the timing constraint, with no filler. The second clause is dense but slightly abstract ('authored essence'), which is the only thing keeping it from a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description carries the burden of describing the return payload — it names the three content types returned, which is adequate. It is complete enough for a low-risk read-only tool, though it omits any note on result size or completeness limits.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all five parameters are already documented in the schema with constraints and interactions. The description only restates the include behavior ('recover that object's full body'), adding no syntax or meaning beyond the schema — the baseline 3 is correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (read) and enumerates exactly what is served by default: authored essence of memories, dated-log entries, and handoffs, plus the #handle recovery path. It does not, however, name or distinguish itself from adjacent siblings such as arroway_search_log or arroway_complete_read, so an agent must infer the boundary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit timing rule — 'BEFORE acting on any task related to it' — which is strong usage guidance. It stops short of naming alternatives or when-not-to-use cases, so it earns a 4 rather than a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources