Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with nested data, optimistic concurrency, optional supersede behavior, operation_key replay, and an output schema, the description nails the key operational concerns: creation vs update, failure on stale versions, reference validation, atomic supersede, encryption/revisions, and agent-private scoping. What remains (status enum, timestamps, operation_key mechanics) is documented in the input schema, so nothing essential is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.