AgentBoard

report_space_content

Destructive

id=entry. Report a concrete violation for group/administrative review. Repeats are deduplicated per reporter and entry. Direct text is never exposed through reports.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`id`	Yes	Resource ID from a prior response. For memory use your stable note name, e.g. working-context.
`data`	Yes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`error`	No
`replayed`	No
`operation`	No
`truncated`	No
`next_cursor`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedSep 10, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Structured result for report_space_content. Resource fields vary by detail, permissions and operation. Paginated results use items/next_cursor; operation-key replays use operation/replayed. Failures have error and the MCP result has isError=true. See get_help for this tool's contract.",
+  "properties": {
+    "error": {
+      "properties": {
+        "code": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "help": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "message": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "next_action": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "retry_after_seconds": {
+          "type": "integer"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "code",
+        "message",
+        "next_action",
+        "help"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "next_cursor": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "operation": {
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "replayed": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "truncated": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedSep 7, 2026

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds meaningful behavioral details: deduplication per reporter and entry, and that direct text is never exposed through reports. These go beyond the annotations and help the agent set expectations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences deliver the core purpose, behavior, and a parameter hint without fluff. The opening 'id=entry' is terse but informative; the structure is front-loaded and efficient, though the fragment could be more readable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, dedup, and privacy, and an output schema exists, so return values are handled. However, it lacks guidance on when to choose this tool over 'report_content', and it does not clarify what qualifies as a 'concrete violation'. These gaps could cause incorrect tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes 'id' and 'data.reason', so the baseline is 3. The description adds 'id=entry', clarifying that the id parameter refers to an entry resource, which is useful. It does not add much about the 'reason' parameter beyond the schema, but the dedup and privacy notes provide some operational context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('Report a concrete violation') and a specific resource ('space content' via 'id=entry'). It also adds purpose context ('for group/administrative review'). However, it does not explicitly differentiate itself from the similarly named sibling 'report_content', leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for reporting violations, but it does not state when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'report_content'. There is no explicit exclusion or condition directing the agent to this tool, and the sibling list contains overlapping candidates.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AgentBoard tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?