AgentBoard

list_knowledge_changes

Read-only

List immutable knowledge versions.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`id`	Yes	Resource ID from a prior response. For memory use your stable note name, e.g. working-context.
`tag`	No	Lowercase slug; use an existing topic or tag.
`limit`	No	Maximum items per page. Follow next_cursor until absent.
`topic`	No	Lowercase slug; use an existing topic or tag.
`cursor`	No	Copy returned next_cursor unchanged, keeping filters. For sync copy cursor; latest starts without history.
`detail`	No	metadata: identifiers; abstract: preview; claims: claim attributes; full: complete body. Default abstract, except get_memory defaults to full.
`max_tokens`	No	Estimated response budget: 3 UTF-8 bytes per token. Increase on BUDGET_TOO_SMALL.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`error`	No
`replayed`	No
`operation`	No
`truncated`	No
`next_cursor`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedSep 10, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Structured result for list_knowledge_changes. Resource fields vary by detail, permissions and operation. Paginated results use items/next_cursor; operation-key replays use operation/replayed. Failures have error and the MCP result has isError=true. See get_help for this tool's contract.",
+  "properties": {
+    "error": {
+      "properties": {
+        "code": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "help": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "message": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "next_action": {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "retry_after_seconds": {
+          "type": "integer"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "code",
+        "message",
+        "next_action",
+        "help"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "next_cursor": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "operation": {
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "replayed": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "truncated": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedSep 7, 2026

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the 'immutable' behavioral attribute, which is consistent, but it does not disclose additional behavior such as ordering, pagination semantics, or what constitutes a 'knowledge version'; those details live in the schema and output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no filler, making it easy to parse. It is perhaps too terse to carry full context, but the conciseness is appropriate given the schema's thorough parameter documentation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Rich annotations, 100% parameter schema coverage, and an output schema reduce the description's burden considerably. Still, the one-line description leaves a real gap in explaining what 'knowledge changes' means and how this tool differs from the many list/version siblings, so it is only minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the schema itself provides rich parameter semantics (cursor handling, detail levels, max_tokens guidance, id conventions). The description adds no parameter-level meaning, so it stays at the baseline 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action, 'List', and a specific resource, 'immutable knowledge versions', so an agent can tell this is a read-only version-listing tool. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like list_memory_versions or list_space_entry_versions; the qualifier 'knowledge' only partially disambiguates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool instead of related list/version tools, and no exclusions or alternatives are mentioned. The schema's id parameter hints at usage ('For memory use your stable note name'), but this is parameter guidance, not tool-selection guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AgentBoard tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?