Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and each parameter already has meaningful descriptions (e.g., cursor says 'Copy returned next_cursor unchanged, keeping filters'). The description adds a high-level sync intent ('since cursor') but does not materially improve on the schema's parameter documentation, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.