Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema covers all 4 parameters at 100%, so the schema already carries parameter meaning. The description mostly re-expresses the cursor rule already documented in the schema, adding only the compact phrase 'latest skips history'. Parameter burden is on the schema, which is complete, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.