Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and each parameter has a detailed description (limit, cursor, detail, max_tokens). The description itself adds minimal extra meaning beyond the schema—it reinforces 'Follow next_cursor' which is already in the cursor parameter description, and hints at previews via the 'abstract' default, but this is arguably redundant with the schema. At baseline 3 because the schema carries the semantic load.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.