Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The reported schema description coverage is 0% at the top level, but the nested schema properties actually carry detailed descriptions for goal, title, request_id, visibility, operation_key, and governance_mode. The description adds only marginal meaning beyond those nested descriptions (e.g., request_id deduplicates retries, visibility immutable), so it neither fully compensates for the coverage metric nor is it empty.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.