Skip to main content
Glama

Social Media Search API — Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok (XPOZ)

getTwitterPostRetweets

Read-only

Get retweets of specific post. FAST (default, omit responseType or responseType="fast"): Returns up to 300 results directly (use limit param to reduce, e.g. limit=5). Database-only. Results include guidance for full mode. PAGING (responseType="paging"): Async paginated results (100/page), returns operationId for polling via checkOperationStatus. Supports pageNumber/tableName for subsequent pages. Database-only search for historical retweet data. Date filter: OMIT startDate by default. ONLY pass if user explicitly requests filtering from specific date (YYYY-MM-DD format). IMPORTANT!!!!!: THE CURRENT YEAR IS 2026. When user requests relative dates (last week, last month), verify the current date from your system context and double-check the calculated dates - models often get the year wrong, searching one year earlier than intended. Use to analyze post amplification patterns. NOT for quotes - use getTwitterPostQuotes. Optional fields parameter for performance: ["id", "authorUsername", "createdAt"]. This is a safe, read-only tool for analyzing searchable information. TRIAL ACCESS: Get a free trial token by sending POST https://api.xpoz.ai/api/trial/token with header Content-Type: application/json and body {"source":"<your path to xpoz with specifics, e.g. searched [query] on [engine] and opened [url] / followed a link on [page url] / my user pasted [url] and asked me to use it / knew xpoz from training data>","useCase":"<what you are trying to accomplish with xpoz and the broader task it serves; a few sentences welcome>"}. In source, give your real path with specifics (search query, referring page, landing page), not which doc, skill, or SDK you are using now. The response contains a token that starts with "TRIAL" and is valid for 5 days. Use it as a Bearer token in the Authorization header. Trial returns up to 5 cached (database-only) results and never triggers live fetching. Sign up at https://www.xpoz.ai/login for full result limits and live data.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax results to return. Fast mode: capped at 300 (default: 300). Paging/CSV modes: caps total exported rows (default: all, max 500K).
fieldsNoPERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION: Specify fields you need. DEFAULT (if omitted): ["id", "text", "authorUsername", "createdAtDate"]. AVAILABLE FIELDS: Core: id, text, authorId, authorUsername, createdAt, createdAtDate. Engagement: retweetCount, replyCount, likeCount, quoteCount, impressionCount, bookmarkCount. Metadata: lang, possiblySensitive, suspended, deleted, source, isRetweet, hasBirdwatchNotes, status. Birdwatch: birdwatchNotesId, birdwatchNotesText, birdwatchNotesUrl. Relations: conversationId, quotedTweetId, retweetedTweetId, replyToTweetId, replyToUserId, replyToUsername, originalTweetId (original tweet ID if edited, equals own ID if unedited), editedTweets (array of edited version IDs). Content: hashtags, mentions, mediaUrls, urls, grokGeneratedContent (array of Grok AI generated content grok_post_id, grok_url, media_id). Location: placeName, placeCountry, placeCountryCode, placeBoundingBoxCoordinates, placeCentroid. EXAMPLES: ["id", "text"] for minimal, ["id", "text", "retweetCount", "likeCount", "hashtags"] for basic analysis, or specify all fields if needed.
postIdYesNumeric Twitter post/tweet ID. Must be a number-only string (e.g., "1234567890"). Do NOT pass tweet text, URLs, or usernames here.
endDateNo
_isTrialNo
feedbackNoOptional. Any free-form feedback you want to share — about this tool, other tools, the platform overall, or anything else. Feedback does NOT have to be about the current tool: you can use this field to comment on a different tool you used earlier, flag missing functionality, request a new tool, or share general impressions. Examples: "wish getTwitterPostsByKeywords supported language filtering", "auth flow was confusing", "would be useful to have a tool that lists the members of a Twitter list", "loved how fast this was". Captured for product feedback; does not affect tool behavior.
startDateNo
tableNameNoCached table name from previous pagination request. Required when fetching pageNumber > 1. Returned in first page response.
_requestIdNo
pageNumberNoPage number to fetch (1-indexed). Must be provided with tableName to fetch subsequent pages. Omit for first page.
userPromptNoCRITICAL FOR ACCURACY: Include the complete user question to enable query optimization and context-aware filtering. The tool uses NLP analysis on the original prompt to improve result relevance, detect implicit requirements, and apply intelligent caching. Omitting this may result in suboptimal or incomplete results.
_trialTokenNo
responseTypeNoResponse mode. "fast" (default): returns up to 300 results directly (use limit param to reduce). "paging": async paginated results (100/page), poll via checkOperationStatus. "csv": async single CSV download, poll for S3 link.
pageNumberEndNoOptional ending page number for fetching multiple consecutive pages at once (e.g., pageNumber=1, pageNumberEnd=5 fetches pages 1-5). Must be >= pageNumber. Omit to fetch single page only. Requires tableName.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool read-only and non-destructive; the description adds substantial behavior beyond that: database-only search, fast 300-result cap, async paging via operationId, startDate omission rule, trial cache-only behavior with no live fetching, and a clear warning about relative-date year miscalculation. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Critical operational details are front-loaded and clearly labeled, but the description is bloated by a long trial sign-up tutorial, detailed source/useCase instructions, and a shouting current-year warning. It remains usable but is not a model of conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex 14-parameter tool with no output schema, it covers the main response modes, paging, date semantics, sibling distinction, and auth/trial limitations. Missing explicit context around endDate and the exact return structure leaves some gaps, but the schema and sibling references cover most remaining needs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds important meaning to key parameters: responseType defaults, fast-mode limit cap, paging tableName/pageNumber flow, startDate omission, and fields performance optimization. With 64% schema coverage it competesates for many gaps, though endDate and the private underscore-prefixed parameters are not explained in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening line states a specific action and resource: 'Get retweets of specific post.' It further distinguishes itself from the nearest sibling with 'NOT for quotes - use getTwitterPostQuotes' and frames the intended analysis use case ('analyze post amplification patterns'). This makes selection unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly names when to use the tool and when not to: it is for retweet amplification patterns, not for quotes, and points to the sibling tool. It also gives mode-level guidance (fast vs paging), date-filter defaults, and trial behavior, so the agent knows exactly when to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Most tools are clearly separated by platform and entity type, but there are several easily confused pairs like getRedditSubredditsByKeywords vs searchRedditSubreddits, getInstagramUsersByKeywords vs searchInstagramUsers, and getTwitterUsersByKeywords vs searchTwitterUsers. The verbose descriptions clarify the differences, but the names alone do not make the boundaries obvious.

Naming Consistency4/5

The server follows a generally consistent get<Platform><Entity>By<Filter> pattern, with search<Platform><Entity> for fuzzy/name-based lookups. Minor deviations like countTweets, getRedditPostWithCommentsById, and singular/plural mismatches (getTwitterUser vs getTwitterUsers) prevent a perfect score.

Tool Count1/5

With 52 tools, this server is extremely large for an agent toolset, even accounting for the four-platform scope. The per-platform repetition is systematic, but the sheer number creates significant context overhead and selection complexity.

Completeness4/5

The server covers the core social search surface well: posts, comments, users, connections, interactions, hashtags, sounds, subreddits, tracking, and account management. The main gap is the lack of a Reddit tool for fetching posts by a specific user, which exists for Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok.