Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world), but the description adds real behavioral context: organization scope returns managed chat runtime policy and available models, but only for staff with workspace owner/admin access, and write access depends on 'Allow changes'. It stops short of describing return shape, though an output schema exists.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.