Skip to main content
Glama

Timix.AI

by ai.timix

set_budget_thresholds

Set the organization-level budget alert thresholds. budget_warning_threshold_percent is the utilization % at which a project is flagged At-Risk; budget_critical_threshold_percent is the % at which it is flagged Over-Budget. The warning threshold must be strictly less than the critical threshold. Supply one or both — only the fields you provide are changed (PATCH semantics). The organization is fixed by your context — never pass an organization id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idempotency_keyNoOptional caller-supplied key; retrying with the same key returns the original result instead of acting twice.
budget_warning_threshold_percentNoUtilization % at which a project is flagged At-Risk (must be less than the critical threshold, 1-99).
budget_critical_threshold_percentNoUtilization % at which a project is flagged Over-Budget (must be greater than the warning threshold, 2-100).

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses PATCH behavior (only provided fields changed) and validation constraints. Does not explicitly state destructiveness, but 'set' implies mutation sufficiently.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise and front-loaded, with no wasted words. Every sentence adds essential information: purpose, parameter roles, constraint, and patch behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, the description is sufficiently complete. Covers constraints, patch semantics, and idempotency. Could mention error handling but not necessary for basic completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value by explaining threshold meanings and the idempotency key behavior. It clarifies relationships between parameters and patch semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it sets organization-level budget alert thresholds, explaining the two parameters and their meanings. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like check_budget_limits and get_budget_alerts by focusing on setting thresholds.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidelines on when to use: supplies validation rule (warning < critical) and PATCH semantics. Does not explicitly compare to siblings, but context signals and parameter descriptions offer clear usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Timix.AI toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools have overlapping purposes, e.g., create_time_report and log_time both create a single time entry with near-identical descriptions. There are also many similar getter/list tools that blur together, making it hard for an agent to select the right one.

Naming Consistency2/5

Most tool names use snake_case, but verbs are inconsistent: 'list' vs 'get' for similar operations, 'manage' combines create/update/delete, and 'use_favorite' is an outlier. This pattern reduces predictability.

Tool Count1/5

With 114 tools, the set is extremely large and far beyond a well-scoped server (typical 3-15). This overwhelms agents and suggests many tools could be consolidated or removed.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface covers a broad domain including customers, projects, tasks, time tracking, invoicing, and user management, but there are gaps like no list_users or direct user listing, and some operations seem redundant rather than filling missing functionality.

Resources