Skip to main content
Glama

reissue_invoice

Void an issued invoice and clone it into a new editable Draft (void + reissue). The original is voided and retained for audit; the new Draft can be edited then re-issued. The void is IRREVERSIBLE. Call once with no token to preview; re-call with the returned confirm_token and an idempotency_key to commit.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
invoice_idYesId of the issued invoice to void and reissue as a new Draft.
confirm_tokenNoToken returned by the preview (call this tool once with no token to get it). Required to commit; expires in ~10 minutes.
idempotency_keyNoRequired when committing (confirm_token present): retrying with the same key returns the original result instead of acting twice.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, the description fully discloses that the void is IRREVERSIBLE, explains the two-step commit process, and notes that the original is retained for audit. This covers all critical behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is 3-4 sentences, front-loaded with the main purpose, and efficiently explains the key aspects without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the workflow fully but omits the return format of the preview call. Given no output schema and moderate complexity, it is nearly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds value by explaining that confirm_token comes from preview and expires, and idempotency_key prevents duplicate commits.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Void an issued invoice and clone it into a new editable Draft (void + reissue)', which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from the sibling 'void_invoice' which only voids.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear usage instructions: call once to preview, then commit with token. It implies this is for reissuing but does not explicitly exclude alternatives like voiding manually.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools have overlapping purposes, e.g., create_time_report and log_time both create a single time entry with near-identical descriptions. There are also many similar getter/list tools that blur together, making it hard for an agent to select the right one.

Naming Consistency2/5

Most tool names use snake_case, but verbs are inconsistent: 'list' vs 'get' for similar operations, 'manage' combines create/update/delete, and 'use_favorite' is an outlier. This pattern reduces predictability.

Tool Count1/5

With 114 tools, the set is extremely large and far beyond a well-scoped server (typical 3-15). This overwhelms agents and suggests many tools could be consolidated or removed.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface covers a broad domain including customers, projects, tasks, time tracking, invoicing, and user management, but there are gaps like no list_users or direct user listing, and some operations seem redundant rather than filling missing functionality.

Resources