Timix.AI

disable_user

Disable an organization member so they can no longer sign in or use the app. Reversible — the user can be re-enabled from the web application. Returns a preview unless confirm=true is set.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`reason`	No	Optional reason for disabling the user (stored for audit purposes).
`confirm`	No	Set true to perform the action. Omit or false returns a preview only — nothing is written.
`org_user_id`	Yes	Id of the OrganizationUser record to disable (not the Firebase userId).
`idempotency_key`	No	Optional caller-supplied key; retrying with the same key returns the original result instead of acting twice.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite no annotations, the description effectively discloses key behaviors: the action is reversible, requires a confirm flag to actually write, returns a preview, and supports an optional reason for auditing. This goes beyond the schema to inform the agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences deliver all essential information without redundancy. Every word serves a purpose, making it highly concise yet complete.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (4 params, no output schema), the description fully covers the behavior, parameter implications, and safety aspects (preview, reversibility). It leaves no significant gaps for an agent to misinterpret.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers all 4 parameters with descriptions. The tool description adds value by explaining how 'confirm' controls preview vs. action and that 'reason' is for audit purposes, complementing the schema details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Disable an organization member so they can no longer sign in or use the app.' The verb and resource are specific, and it distinguishes from related siblings like 'enable_user' and 'remove_user'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use: to disable a user, and notes that it is reversible via the web app. It also clarifies the preview mode vs. actual execution with 'confirm=true'. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like 'remove_user'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Timix.AI tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3/5.0

Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools have overlapping purposes, e.g., create_time_report and log_time both create a single time entry with near-identical descriptions. There are also many similar getter/list tools that blur together, making it hard for an agent to select the right one.

Naming Consistency2/5

Most tool names use snake_case, but verbs are inconsistent: 'list' vs 'get' for similar operations, 'manage' combines create/update/delete, and 'use_favorite' is an outlier. This pattern reduces predictability.

Tool Count1/5

With 114 tools, the set is extremely large and far beyond a well-scoped server (typical 3-15). This overwhelms agents and suggests many tools could be consolidated or removed.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface covers a broad domain including customers, projects, tasks, time tracking, invoicing, and user management, but there are gaps like no list_users or direct user listing, and some operations seem redundant rather than filling missing functionality.

Resources

Need Help?