Skip to main content
Glama

Timix.AI

by ai.timix

close_month

Close a billing month so no further time can be logged or edited in it. Call once with no token to preview; re-call with the returned confirm_token and an idempotency_key to commit. Reversible only by reopening the month.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
yearYesCalendar year of the month to close (e.g. 2026).
monthYesCalendar month to close (1-12).
confirm_tokenNoToken returned by the preview (call this tool once with no token to get it). Required to commit; expires in ~10 minutes.
idempotency_keyNoRequired when committing (confirm_token present): retrying with the same key returns the original result instead of acting twice.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses key behaviors: preview mode (no token) vs commit mode (with token and idempotency key), idempotency semantics, and reversibility. No annotations are provided, so description carries full burden and does so well, though could mention error cases.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no redundant information. First sentence states purpose, second and third explain procedure and reversibility. Efficient and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers main aspects: purpose, procedure, and reversibility. Lacks mention of required permissions or error handling, but given the tool's moderate complexity and lack of output schema, the description is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions, but the description adds value by explaining the role of confirm_token and idempotency_key in the two-step process, and the preview/commit distinction.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (close a billing month) and its effect (no further time can be logged or edited). Distinguishes from sibling 'reopen_month' by mentioning reversibility only through reopening.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Describes the two-step procedure (preview then commit) but does not explicitly state when to use the tool (e.g., after month finalization) or when not to use it. Lacks comparison to alternatives beyond mentioning reopen_month.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Timix.AI toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools have overlapping purposes, e.g., create_time_report and log_time both create a single time entry with near-identical descriptions. There are also many similar getter/list tools that blur together, making it hard for an agent to select the right one.

Naming Consistency2/5

Most tool names use snake_case, but verbs are inconsistent: 'list' vs 'get' for similar operations, 'manage' combines create/update/delete, and 'use_favorite' is an outlier. This pattern reduces predictability.

Tool Count1/5

With 114 tools, the set is extremely large and far beyond a well-scoped server (typical 3-15). This overwhelms agents and suggests many tools could be consolidated or removed.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface covers a broad domain including customers, projects, tasks, time tracking, invoicing, and user management, but there are gaps like no list_users or direct user listing, and some operations seem redundant rather than filling missing functionality.

Resources