Skip to main content
Glama

Get Documentation Page

docs_get
Read-only

Fetches one Meridian public product documentation page in full by relative path (for example mcp-server.mdx, or a nested guides/some-page.mdx). Use after docs_search when you need the whole page. Paths match the meridian://docs/{path} resource index. No app_id. These docs are not app-scoped. Returns path, title, public URL, and markdown/MDX content.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "path": "<path>"
    },
    "name": "docs_get"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesRelative docs path ending in .md or .mdx, as listed by meridian://docs/ or returned by docs_search.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/openWorld=false, so the description's added value is the non-app-scoped constraint and the path-to-resource-index relationship, plus the return fields (path, title, URL, content). It doesn't say what happens on a nonexistent path, a minor omission.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the purpose, then usage, scope note, and return shape in a compact paragraph with no filler; the return-field enumeration is slightly verbose but useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read-only tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description covers purpose, sequencing, scope caveat, and return values — nothing an agent needs is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; the description earns more by giving concrete path examples (`mcp-server.mdx`, nested `guides/some-page.mdx`) and tying the path format to the `meridian://docs/{path}` index.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource — fetches one full Meridian documentation page by relative path — and explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling docs_search (whole page vs. search).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit sequencing guidance ('Use after `docs_search` when you need the whole page') and an exclusion ('No `app_id`. These docs are not app-scoped'), which prevents a likely invocation error.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources