select_ai_pack_growth_versionSet this account's default hosted intelligence checkpoint for an owned Pack. Use sequence 0 to return to the signed base Pack; selection never rewrites the seller Pack.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sequence | Yes | ||
| productId | Yes | Tetrees AI Pack product id | |
| confirmation | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description discloses the key behavioral nuance that selection never rewrites the seller Pack, and the readOnlyHint=false annotation correctly signals mutation. It could be more explicit about what exactly is updated (account-level default) and whether confirmation is required, but the core side effect is described.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise at two sentences, with no filler or redundant wording. It packs the essential action and an important caveat into a compact form.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema and the description gives enough high-level context to understand the action, but the lack of explanation for confirmation and the precise meaning of 'intelligence checkpoint' leaves some gaps. It is adequate but not fully self-contained.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is only 33%, with only productId described (and with a typo). The sequence parameter is partially explained by the 'sequence 0 to return' note, but confirmation is not described at all. The description does not sufficiently compensate for the missing schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'set' and the object 'default hosted intelligence checkpoint for an owned Pack.' It distinguishes itself somewhat by focusing on selecting a default from existing growth versions, but the phrasing is jargon-heavy and could be clearer about how it differs from accept/propose tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly explain when to use this tool instead of sibling tools like accept_ai_pack_growth or propose_ai_pack_growth. It only mentions using sequence 0 to return to the base Pack, but does not provide decision guidance for an agent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Most tools are clearly distinct by action and resource, though several clusters (accept/propose/select/list growth, prepare/execute/run) require careful reading of descriptions to avoid confusion.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, with clear action prefixes and descriptive resource nouns.
With 26 tools, the set exceeds the recommended range and feels heavy, even though the domain covers publishing, runtime, growth, and reporting workflows.
The toolkit covers the main AI pack lifecycle—authoring, publishing, acquisition, running, searching, and reporting—but lacks explicit delete/revoke operations for drafts or entitlements.