Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is high (83%) with self-documenting descriptions for cursor, sortBy, status, creator and projectId, so the structured data carries the load. The description's mention of 'account or of one project' and default sort largely restates the schema rather than adding syntax or edge-case meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.