SnowSure — Snow & Ski

Roadside weather

get_road_weather

Read-onlyIdempotent

Measured roadside weather (RWIS) on the highways near a resort — surface + air temperature, visibility, wind, precipitation (Colorado via CDOT, Washington via WSDOT, Oregon via ODOT TripCheck RWIS, Montana via MDT 511, Wyoming via WYDOT 511, Utah via UDOT, New England via Compass C2C). Sensor data on the actual road, distinct from the modeled get_operating_risk. Returns 'no road weather' outside the covered area.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`slug`	No	Resort slug or name, e.g. "portillo" or "Portillo". Required unless `resort` is given.
`resort`	No	Same as `slug`: the resort slug or name. Pass either one.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`markdown`	No	Human-readable markdown summary of the tool result (may be omitted when structuredContent carries a typed payload; content[0].text always has the prose).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed3 schema fields changedSep 16, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / resort

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Same as `slug`: the resort slug or name. Pass either one.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedInput schema / properties / slug / description

Previous value: -"Resort slug"New value: +"Resort slug or name, e.g. \"portillo\" or \"Portillo\". Required unless `resort` is given."

removedInput schema / required
```
Removed value: -[
-  "slug"
-]
```

Changed2 schema fields changedJul 2, 2026

changedOutput schema / properties / markdown / description

Previous value: -"Human-readable markdown summary of the tool result."New value: +"Human-readable markdown summary of the tool result (may be omitted when structuredContent carries a typed payload; content[0].text always has the prose)."

removedOutput schema / required
```
Removed value: -[
-  "markdown"
-]
```

AddedJun 25, 2026

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint/idempotentHint/destructiveHint annotations, the description reveals concrete behavioral details: data comes from specific state DOT/RWIS sources, it covers only listed regions, it reports 'no road weather' outside that coverage, and the data is measured rather than modeled. This is exactly the kind of context that helps an agent reason about results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense sentence that front-loads the core purpose and data types, then adds provenance and edge-case behavior. The state/agency parenthetical is slightly long but earns its place by defining actual data coverage; nothing is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only lookup tool with two self-documented optional parameters and an output schema, the description covers the essential operational context: data categories, data sources, geographic coverage, the no-data result, and the distinction from the modeled alternative. An agent has enough to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents slug and resort with examples and notes that either may be used, so description value is limited. The description adds that the weather is 'near a resort' and enumerates coverage regions, which indirectly helps interpret the parameter's meaning, but it does not materially extend the schema's parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as retrieving measured roadside weather (RWIS) near a resort, enumerates the exact data types (surface/air temperature, visibility, wind, precipitation), and explicitly distinguishes it from the modeled get_operating_risk. This gives an agent a precise, unambiguous understanding of what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description tells the agent this is the tool for measured, on-road sensor data rather than modeled conditions, and names the covered regions and the 'no road weather' edge case. It does not explicitly contrast with other nearby siblings like get_road_access or get_weather_forecast, but the distinction from get_operating_risk plus the geographic qualification provides clear enough usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All SnowSure — Snow & Ski tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?