Skip to main content
Glama

Rokha

by ai.rokha
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

orbitx_get_signals · Orbitx

orbitx__orbitx_get_signals
Read-only

Live trading signals / alerts feed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
authCodeNoOrbitX authCode from the dashboard paste message or orbitx_auth_link. After auth, pass this on every tool call (required for Grok). Auth contract: signing tools (backend-signed trades, launches, burns, NFT mints) accept EITHER a valid authCode OR an authenticated session (OAuth/API-key bearer from a linked chat). The 5-minute auto-fill sweep and other server-side jobs run under their own internal credential — they never take an authCode. An authCode is sufficient but not the only accepted credential; a missing/invalid credential is rejected, never silently trusted.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / authCode / description
      Previous value: -"OrbitX authCode from the dashboard paste message or orbitx_auth_link. After auth, pass this on every tool call (required for Grok)."New value: +"OrbitX authCode from the dashboard paste message or orbitx_auth_link. After auth, pass this on every tool call (required for Grok). Auth contract: signing tools (backend-signed trades, launches, burns, NFT mints) accept EITHER a valid authCode OR an authenticated session (OAuth/API-key bearer from a linked chat). The 5-minute auto-fill sweep and other server-side jobs run under their own internal credential — they never take an authCode. An authCode is sufficient but not the only accepted credential; a missing/invalid credential is rejected, never silently trusted."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -true
    • addedInput schema / properties
      Added value: +{
+  "authCode": {
+    "description": "OrbitX authCode from the dashboard paste message or orbitx_auth_link. After auth, pass this on every tool call (required for Grok).",
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "limit": {
+    "default": 20,
+    "type": "integer"
+  }
+}
  3. First observed

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the call read-only and open-world. The authCode description adds useful credential behavior (required after auth; invalid credentials rejected), but the tool description itself only adds the word 'live' and does not explain what the feed returns or how it behaves (ordering, pagination, alert semantics).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The main description is a compact, front-loaded phrase with no filler. It is appropriately short for a simple read tool, though the authCode text is verbose enough to make the overall definition less balanced.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists and the description does not state what fields appear in the feed, how limit applies, or what differentiates signals from alerts. An agent can guess it should call with an optional limit, but the return contract is too underspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

authCode receives a detailed description covering auth alternatives and rejection behavior. limit only has a default value with no explanation, and the main description does not clarify it; with 50% schema coverage, the unresolved parameter keeps this at a 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource as a live trading signals/alerts feed, and the tool name supplies the 'get' verb. It does not explicitly differentiate among the many Orbitx feed tools (e.g., social_feed, telegram_status), so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool instead of other Orbitx data tools; the description never mentions alternatives or conditions. The authCode text explains credential handling but not tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Rokha toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources