Skip to main content
Glama

search_tools

Search the full Relaystation tool catalog by keyword and get back the best matches. Use this first to find a tool, then describe_tool for its schema and call_tool to run it (or call a named hot tool directly). query is free text (e.g. "merge pdf", "csv to json", "send telegram"). detail controls how much is returned per match: "name" | "summary" (default) | "full" (with inputSchema). limit defaults to 5. FREE. Example: search_tools {query:"merge pdf", limit:5}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
queryYes
detailNo

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description mentions it's FREE, read-only search behavior, and outlines output control via detail parameter. Lack of explicit read-only flag is minor given context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences front-loaded with purpose, followed by usage flow and parameter details. Every sentence adds value, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers key aspects: purpose, usage, parameters, and costing. Lacks explicit return structure details, but for a search tool the description is sufficient given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema coverage, the description explains all three parameters: query is free text, detail controls output verbosity with enum values listed, limit defaults to 5 with range implied. Completely compensates for schema gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it searches the tool catalog by keyword and returns best matches. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like describe_tool and call_tool by positioning as the first step.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to use this first, then describe_tool for schema and call_tool to run. Provides query examples and explains parameter defaults, giving clear when-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct action and resource, such as baton operations, agent messaging, contracts, and account management. There is no overlap in functionality, making it clear which tool to use for each task.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., append_to_baton, create_baton, message_agent). The verbs are descriptive and uniform, aiding predictability.

Tool Count5/5

With 14 tools, the server covers its domain (agent coordination, batons, contracts, tool discovery) without being overbearing. The count is well-scoped for a platform offering a variety of operations.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers core operations like creating, reading, and appending to batons, as well as messaging and contracts. However, it lacks list or delete operations for batons and contracts, which are notable gaps for a complete lifecycle.

Resources