RegLayer Instant Decision Briefs

Get structured Instant Brief

get_instant_brief_result

Read-onlyIdempotent

Read the structured result after status reaches ready. If still researching, close the call and retry after 20 seconds.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`order_id`	Yes	The order_id returned by the paid Instant Brief purchase request.
`access_token`	Yes	The private RegLayer access token returned with the order. Send it only to RegLayer and never expose it to the end user.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`ok`	No	Whether the private status request succeeded.
`error`	No	A machine-readable error label when the request cannot be completed.
`notice`	No	The notice that must travel with RegLayer research outputs.
`result`	No	The complete structured Decision Brief when research is ready.
`status`	No	The current order state, such as researching, ready, or failed.
`message`	No	A human-readable status, authentication, or not-ready message.
`product`	No	The purchased Instant Brief product code.
`brief_id`	No	The Decision Brief identifier used in the finished artifact.
`order_id`	No	The private RegLayer order identifier.
`reference`	No	The customer-facing brief reference.
`api_version`	No	The version of the RegLayer agent delivery contract.
`result_kind`	No	The type of structured artifact returned.
`published_at`	No	The timestamp when the result became available.
`delivery_mode`	No	The asynchronous delivery pattern used for this order.
`result_version`	No	The version of the stored structured result.
`poll_after_seconds`	No	Seconds to wait before the next status check, or null when no further polling is needed.
`connection_required`	No	Whether the original connection must remain open.
`delivery_instructions`	No	Instructions for retrieving the result without relying on email.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already convey readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds the retry condition and the 'still researching' state, which is valuable context beyond the annotations. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a concise two-sentence statement that directly states the purpose and the retry instruction without any fluff. It is front-loaded and effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a comprehensive input schema, an output schema available, annotations covering safety, and a description that includes when to use and retry, the tool is fully contextualized. The sibling tools further clarify differentiation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides full descriptions for both parameters (order_id and access_token) at 100% coverage, so the description does not need to add detail. It contributes no additional parameter semantics, but the baseline is 3 given complete schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Read') and the resource ('structured result' of an Instant Brief) and specifies a prerequisite condition ('after status reaches ready'). It is distinct from siblings like get_instant_brief_pdf (likely PDF) and get_instant_brief_status (likely status only).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear timing guidance for when to call (after status ready) and includes a retry instruction ('close the call and retry after 20 seconds'). It does not explicitly name alternative tools for when not to use it, but the sibling context makes the intended usage obvious.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All RegLayer Instant Decision Briefs tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

The paired get_check_* and get_instant_brief_* tools are clearly separated by product prefix, and prepare_* tools have distinct purposes. The only slight overlap is list_reglayer_products, which appears to be the broader catalog containing the Instant Brief products listed by list_instant_brief_products.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows a predictable verb_noun pattern with get_, list_, and prepare_ prefixes and product-specific suffixes. The Check and Instant Brief groups are symmetrically named, making the API surface easy to navigate.

Tool Count5/5

Ten tools is well-scoped for a dual-product regulatory research server. Each tool covers a distinct step in the workflow: product discovery, request preparation, status polling, result retrieval, and PDF download.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface forms a complete workflow: list products, prepare a purchase request, poll status, then retrieve structured results and authenticated PDFs. No obvious dead ends or missing operations within the stated domain.

Resources

Need Help?