Skip to main content
Glama

Captions

set_captions
Destructive

Turn narration captions on or off. Needs a voiceover with audio.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "listingId": "<listingId>",
      "enabled": "<enabled>"
    },
    "name": "set_captions"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
enabledYesTurn narration captions on (true) or off (false).
listingIdYesListing id from list_listings.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statusNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / enabled / description
      Added value: +"Turn narration captions on (true) or off (false)."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false, so the safety profile is partly covered. The description adds the meaningful precondition about requiring an audio voiceover, but it does not explain what the destructive flag means here — e.g. whether turning captions off discards existing caption edits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero padding, and the action statement is front-loaded ahead of the prerequisite. Nothing could be removed without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema and annotations are supplied, so return values and safety flags need not be repeated. However, for a tool flagged destructive, the definition should say what state is lost when captions are turned off or what happens if the requirement isn't met — that gap leaves the agent guessing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters are documented in the schema, including the true/false semantics of 'enabled' and the source of 'listingId'. The description adds essentially no parameter-level detail beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: turning narration captions on or off. The resource (narration captions) is distinct enough from siblings like set_music or set_title, though the description never explicitly contrasts with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Includes a real applicability condition — 'Needs a voiceover with audio' — which tells the agent when the tool will work. It stops short of naming alternatives or saying what to do when no voiceover exists, but the prerequisite is clearly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources