Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 50%, and the schema itself already documents workspace_id, url, data, file, and file_name in detail. The description only reinforces the idempotency_key concept ('stable idempotency key'), adding little about the media_uploads item shape or the workspace_id fallback. This is the baseline case where the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.