Pimea

pimea_chat

Send a message in an active Pimea session. Use this to answer Pimea's clarifying questions about the user's marketing situation.

You can answer on behalf of the user using context from the conversation when possible. Only ask the user directly if you genuinely lack the information.

When the response status is "complete", call pimea_get_answer to retrieve the final grounded deliverable.

Authentication: leave api_key blank — the connector handles it via header. Only set it as a fallback if the connector cannot send custom headers.

Args:
    session_id: The session UUID from pimea_start_session
    message: Response to Pimea's question
    api_key: Optional fallback only. Normally leave blank.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`api_key`	No
`message`	Yes
`session_id`	Yes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`result`	Yes

TDQS

A5/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the conversational behavior (answer on behalf when possible), the response status handling ('complete' → get_answer), and the authentication fallback mechanism (leave api_key blank unless connector can't send headers). This is rich behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the main purpose, followed by targeted usage guidance, a brief auth note, and a clear Args list. No wasted sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema covers return structure, the description completes the picture with workflow integration (start_session → chat → get_answer), the on-behalf policy, and authentication details. It's fully sufficient for invoking this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% coverage, but the Args section explains session_id as 'The session UUID from pimea_start_session', message as 'Response to Pimea's question', and api_key as 'Optional fallback only'. This adds essential semantics missing from the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Send a message in an active Pimea session,' a specific verb+resource statement. It further clarifies this is for answering Pimea's clarifying questions, and distinguishes from pimea_get_answer by instructing to call that tool when status is complete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use ('answer Pimea's clarifying questions'), provides a decision rule for answering on behalf of the user vs asking directly, and names the alternative (pimea_get_answer) for retrieving the final deliverable. It also gives authentication usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Pimea tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A5/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct role in the session lifecycle: starting a session, sending chat messages, and retrieving the final answer. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools use a consistent snake_case convention with the 'pimea_' prefix, following a verb_noun pattern (start_session, chat, get_answer). This makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count5/5

The three-tool set is well-scoped for the server's purpose of managing Pimea marketing sessions. Each tool is necessary for the core workflow, and there are no redundant or missing tools.

Completeness5/5

The tools provide complete lifecycle coverage for a Pimea session: start, interact, and retrieve the final deliverable. No obvious gaps exist for the intended use case.

Resources

Need Help?