Skip to main content
Glama

Extend disposable temp phone number

phone_extend_temp

Rent another 30 minutes on a live disposable temp number — each call pushes expires_at 30 min further (stackable up to 24h total lease). Owner-only; expired temp leases cannot be revived (lease a fresh one via phone_temp_number). Costs 0.20 USDC, paid per-action via x402.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
paymentNobase64 x402 payment payload (X-PAYMENT); omit on first call to receive payment instructions
number_idYesTemp number lease id returned by phone_temp_number

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and excels: it discloses stackability ('each call pushes expires_at 30 min further'), a cap ('up to 24h total lease'), ownership restriction, unrecoverable expiration, and the exact cost (0.20 USDC) and payment mechanism. This is comprehensive behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences, front-loaded with the primary action. Every clause adds a specific constraint, behavior, or cost—no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given this is a simple extension operation with two params and no output schema, the description provides all necessary context: what it does, how accumulation works, exceptions (expired), alternative path, and cost. The agent has enough to decide when and how to invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% coverage of both parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds context that number_id is a lease id from phone_temp_number, but does not add significant parameter-level semantics beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Rent another 30 minutes') and resource ('live disposable temp number'), and explicitly contrasts with a fresh lease via phone_temp_number, distinguishing it from the sibling tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear usage context: 'Owner-only' indicates who can use it, and 'expired temp leases cannot be revived (lease a fresh one via phone_temp_number)' gives an explicit when-not case and alternative. It also mentions the payment method (x402) for each action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, clearly separated by domain prefixes (card_, email_, phone_, tiktok_). The only potential overlap is phone_read_messages vs wait_for_otp, but wait_for_otp is specifically for OTP extraction and is described as a replacement for hand-rolled polling, making the boundary clear. Status pollers are also domain-specific (card_status, tiktok_connect_status, tiktok_operation_status) and not ambiguous.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case convention with domain-first prefixes (e.g., card_buy, email_send, tiktok_post, phone_temp_number). Even less common names like wait_for_otp and i402_plan are descriptive and stylistically consistent. There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count4/5

33 tools is above the typical 3-15 range, but the server covers a broad multi-domain purpose (cards, compute, domains, email, phone, TikTok, Twitter, orchestration). Each domain has a focused and coherent set, so the count feels justified rather than bloated. It is slightly high, but not excessively so.

Completeness3/5

Coverage is solid for email, phone, and TikTok, with full lifecycle operations (create, read, extend, delete/cancel where applicable). However, there are notable gaps: compute has only deploy (no list/stop/delete), domains have only check/register (no list/delete), and Twitter has only post (no read/manage). These gaps could force agents to work around missing resource management.