Skip to main content
Glama

Bundle SAP MCP Skills

sap_skills_bundle

Return bundled SAP MCP skills as JSON so an agent can load or write them itself. Pass skills: ["name1","name2"] to bundle only specific skills (filterNames pattern). Pass includeContents: false to get only file paths without content (metadata-only mode for cheap discovery). Combine both for efficient loading: skills:["sap-defi"], includeContents:true returns only the sap-defi skill files with full content, avoiding context bloat from unused skills.

SAP MCP execution guidance: Intent: agent bootstrap, routing, skills, or repair guidance. Pricing: free; call directly without x402. Routing: free hosted call; call directly and keep it small/exact when possible. Signer boundary: hosted reads/builders never receive keypair bytes; value-moving results must be finalized locally when signing is required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
skillsNoOptional subset of bundled skill names to bundle. When omitted, all bundled skills are returned. Use this to load only the skills you need and avoid context bloat.
includeContentsNoWhen false, only file paths are returned without file content (metadata-only). When true (default), full file contents are included. Set to false for cheap discovery, then call again with skills:["name"] and includeContents:true for only the skills you need.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contentYesMCP content blocks returned to the caller.
isErrorNoTrue when the tool result represents an application-level error.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are all false, providing no behavioral hints. Description compensates with execution guidance (free, direct call, signer boundary) and explains that it returns data without side effects. It adds value beyond the empty annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first paragraph is concise and front-loaded. The second paragraph contains generic SAP MCP execution guidance that may not be specific to this tool, adding some redundancy. Overall efficient but could be trimmed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given simple parameters, high schema coverage, and an output schema (context confirms), the description is complete. It explains usage patterns, return value (JSON), and provides context for when and how to use each parameter optimally.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions already cover both parameters well (100% coverage). The description adds an example ('skills:["sap-defi"], includeContents:true') and the 'filterNames' pattern, enhancing clarity beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Return bundled SAP MCP skills as JSON' with a specific verb and resource. Provides distinct use cases (filter names, metadata-only) but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like sap_skills_list or sap_skills_install.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Offers clear usage patterns: 'filterNames' for specific skills, 'includeContents: false' for cheap discovery, and combining both for efficient loading. Does not explicitly state when not to use or compare to alternatives, but the guidance is actionable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are organized by protocol prefix (e.g., adrena_, jupiter_, sap_) which helps distinguish domains. Within each protocol, tool names clearly indicate actions (e.g., openPosition, getQuote). However, with 360 tools, some cross-protocol overlaps (e.g., multiple swap tools) and many similar fetch tools in the sap_* family require careful reading of descriptions to disambiguate.

Naming Consistency4/5

Each protocol group follows a consistent naming convention (e.g., snake_case for adrena_, camelCase for 3land, sap_ prefix for SAP SDK tools). The mix of conventions across protocols is acceptable, though a uniform style would improve predictability. Minor inconsistency: hyphenated names like metaplex-nft_ vs underscores.

Tool Count2/5

360 tools is far too many for a well-scoped MCP server. This aggregates dozens of protocols and SAP-specific features, making navigation difficult. The server would benefit from being split into focused micro-servers (e.g., SAP identity, Jupiter DEX, NFT tools). The current count overwhelms the coherence of the set.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a vast range of Solana ecosystem activities: token operations, swaps, staking, NFT management, bridging, oracle data, identity registration, chat, escrow, subscriptions, and premium streaming. Major lifecycle operations are present, though some niche subdomains may have missing functions (e.g., detailed governance or lending management). Overall, it's comprehensive for the intended scope.