Skip to main content
Glama

SAP MCP Server

by ai.oobeprotocol.sap.mcp

Migrate Agent Pricing Menu

sap_agent_migrate_pricing_menu

Backfill or resync the AgentPricingMenu PDA for the connected wallet SAP agent. Run this once if sap_update_agent, sap_close_agent, or createEscrowV2 fails with AccountNotInitialized on the pricing_menu account. Agents registered before pricing menus were created at registration need this one-time migration. Local-signer-only; hosted accountless SAP MCP rejects this direct write before x402 payment. SAP MCP context: Direct synapse-sap-sdk wrapper served by this MCP. Read tools return on-chain state; write tools require signer policy, configured RPC, and the active SAP profile.

SAP MCP execution guidance: Intent: agent bootstrap, routing, skills, or repair guidance. Pricing: paid read-premium; estimate first, then use sap_payments_call_paid_tool when the runtime cannot replay x402 natively. Routing: paid hosted call; call sap_estimate_tool_cost first, then use sap_payments_call_paid_tool if the runtime cannot handle x402 natively. Signer boundary: hosted reads/builders never receive keypair bytes; value-moving results must be finalized locally when signing is required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contentYesMCP content blocks returned to the caller.
isErrorNoTrue when the tool result represents an application-level error.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only indicate readOnly=false, openWorld=true, idempotent=false, destructive=false. The description adds valuable context: this is a one-time migration, requires local signer, hosted MCP rejects it before payment, and write tools need signer policy, configured RPC, and active SAP profile. It also warns to run once, aligning with the non-idempotent annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first part is focused and front-loaded, but the description then includes a generic 'SAP MCP execution guidance' block that is largely boilerplate and repeated in the input schema. This makes the description wordier than necessary, though the structure is logical.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there are no parameters and an output schema exists, the description fully covers operation purpose, triggers, migration context, signer constraints, and execution requirements. It gives enough context for an agent to decide and invoke correctly, including payment and profile prerequisites.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the schema is complete and the description need not add parameter-level semantics. Per the rubric, 0 parameters earns a baseline 4, and there is no missing parameter information to penalize.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Backfill or resync the AgentPricingMenu PDA for the connected wallet SAP agent.' It clearly identifies the action, target, and scope, and distinguishes this tool from siblings by naming the exact failure condition and related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use instructions: run once if sap_update_agent, sap_close_agent, or createEscrowV2 fails with AccountNotInitialized on pricing_menu, or for agents registered before pricing menus existed. It also states a clear when-not/exclusion: hosted accountless SAP MCP rejects this direct write, so local-signer-only is required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All SAP MCP Server toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are organized by protocol prefix (e.g., adrena_, jupiter_, sap_) which helps distinguish domains. Within each protocol, tool names clearly indicate actions (e.g., openPosition, getQuote). However, with 360 tools, some cross-protocol overlaps (e.g., multiple swap tools) and many similar fetch tools in the sap_* family require careful reading of descriptions to disambiguate.

Naming Consistency4/5

Each protocol group follows a consistent naming convention (e.g., snake_case for adrena_, camelCase for 3land, sap_ prefix for SAP SDK tools). The mix of conventions across protocols is acceptable, though a uniform style would improve predictability. Minor inconsistency: hyphenated names like metaplex-nft_ vs underscores.

Tool Count2/5

360 tools is far too many for a well-scoped MCP server. This aggregates dozens of protocols and SAP-specific features, making navigation difficult. The server would benefit from being split into focused micro-servers (e.g., SAP identity, Jupiter DEX, NFT tools). The current count overwhelms the coherence of the set.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a vast range of Solana ecosystem activities: token operations, swaps, staking, NFT management, bridging, oracle data, identity registration, chat, escrow, subscriptions, and premium streaming. Major lifecycle operations are present, though some niche subdomains may have missing functions (e.g., detailed governance or lending management). Overall, it's comprehensive for the intended scope.

Resources