Skip to main content
Glama

SAP MCP Server

by ai.oobeprotocol.sap.mcp

Jupiter Get Price

jupiter_getPrice
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get real-time heuristic prices for tokens. Supports buy/sell price, confidence, and depth info. SAP MCP context: Jupiter protocol tools are served as AgentKit ecosystem tools. Use them for quote, route, and swap preparation, then use SAP transaction preview/sign/submit tools when an unsigned transaction must pass MCP signer policy. Parameter aliases accepted by SAP MCP: mint/id/token/address -> ids[0]. Prefer canonical ids: string[] in new calls.

SAP MCP execution guidance: Intent: read/discovery workflow. Pricing: free; call directly without x402. Routing: free hosted call; call directly and keep it small/exact when possible. Signer boundary: hosted reads/builders never receive keypair bytes; value-moving results must be finalized locally when signing is required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idsYesToken mints to price
vsTokenNoToken mint address (base58)
showExtraInfoNoInclude confidence, depth, timestamps

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contentYesMCP content blocks returned to the caller.
isErrorNoTrue when the tool result represents an application-level error.

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true. Description adds 'heuristic prices', 'Supports buy/sell price, confidence, and depth info', and 'free hosted call; call directly and keep it small/exact'. Also explains signer boundary and that no keypair bytes are exposed, surpassing annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is slightly long but well-organized with clear sections (purpose, SAP context, execution guidance). Each sentence adds necessary context, though some repetition occurs (e.g., pricing details appear twice). Structurally sound.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple price query tool with 3 parameters (1 required), output schema exists (not shown), and annotations are rich. Description covers intent, pricing model, routing behavior, signer boundary, and parameter alias handling. Nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 3 parameters (ids, vsToken, showExtraInfo) with descriptions. Description adds value by noting 'Parameter aliases accepted by SAP MCP: mint/id/token/address -> ids[0]' and advising to use exact field names. This clarifies flexible input formats beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get real-time heuristic prices for tokens' and lists supported details (buy/sell price, confidence, depth). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like coingecko_getTokenPrice or pyth_getPrice by focusing on Jupiter's heuristic approach.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit context: 'Use them for quote, route, and swap preparation, then use SAP transaction preview/sign/submit tools...' Also specifies 'Intent: read/discovery workflow' and 'Pricing: free; call directly without x402'. This clearly guides when to use this tool vs. value-moving alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All SAP MCP Server toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are organized by protocol prefix (e.g., adrena_, jupiter_, sap_) which helps distinguish domains. Within each protocol, tool names clearly indicate actions (e.g., openPosition, getQuote). However, with 360 tools, some cross-protocol overlaps (e.g., multiple swap tools) and many similar fetch tools in the sap_* family require careful reading of descriptions to disambiguate.

Naming Consistency4/5

Each protocol group follows a consistent naming convention (e.g., snake_case for adrena_, camelCase for 3land, sap_ prefix for SAP SDK tools). The mix of conventions across protocols is acceptable, though a uniform style would improve predictability. Minor inconsistency: hyphenated names like metaplex-nft_ vs underscores.

Tool Count2/5

360 tools is far too many for a well-scoped MCP server. This aggregates dozens of protocols and SAP-specific features, making navigation difficult. The server would benefit from being split into focused micro-servers (e.g., SAP identity, Jupiter DEX, NFT tools). The current count overwhelms the coherence of the set.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a vast range of Solana ecosystem activities: token operations, swaps, staking, NFT management, bridging, oracle data, identity registration, chat, escrow, subscriptions, and premium streaming. Major lifecycle operations are present, though some niche subdomains may have missing functions (e.g., detailed governance or lending management). Overall, it's comprehensive for the intended scope.

Resources